New proposal by LDCs | Centre for Science and Environment

Saturday, December 3, 2011 - 03:39
Saturday, December 3, 2011 - 03:39

New proposal by LDCs


Durban, December 2: As the UN climate change talks enter the 5th day in Durban, tempo in the negotiation rooms is gradually picking up.  While about 50 odd items are being discussed and the chairs of the different groups are trying to piece in the negotiating texts by Saturday, before the high level ministerial segment begins, the Least Developed Countries (LDCs) have proposed a middle-of-the-road solution to keep the climate change talks active. A draft proposal the LDCs submitted advocates a set of parallel treaties that will not only take into account emissions reduction targets for the Annex 1 parties but also for non-Kyoto parties like the United States and emerging economies like China and India.

Developing countries described the new draft as the way to keep the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol alive and at the same time give countries like US space to take legally binding cuts outside the Kyoto Protocol. The draft says that in order to stop global temperatures from crossing 1.5°C  and stabilize global greenhouse gas emissions at 350 part per million, global emissions should peak by no later than 2015. It proposes to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 85 per cent below 1990 levels by 2050.

Developing countries think their proposal could be a stepping stone, because the draft links any legally binding treaty to the concepts of equity and common but differentiated responsibility (CBDR). And, it is based on the guiding principles of the Bali Roadmap . The draft proposes a mechanism to periodically review the adequacy of the commitments and a process to enhance ambitions over time. It also talks about provisions for compliance and enforcement.

A senior negotiator from India said that while they were “not unhappy” with the proposal, it still required a lot of fine-tuning. For one, the draft does not say that the legally binding instrument will be made operational using CBDR. Two, certain terminologies with respect to entry of emerging economies like India and China into  legally binding commitment are still very vague. “We want other countries to add to this draft, keeping the basic principles of equity, CBDR and Bali Roadmap intact,” said a senior negotiator of African group.


India's environment minister Jayanthi Natarajan speaks during a break of Indaba, the final negotiation process of the CoP17 at Durban
NGO's flash protest - NGO's from around the world protest inside the convention center sneaking passed the UN security
Do no support companies that burn waste, said the Global Alliance of Waste Pickers at a protest demonstration during the COP17 at Durban
To boot out or not to boot out the USA: A debate between LDC & The EU

DTE Cover Story

Press Releases

Wednesday, December 7, 2011 - 10:44
India's environment minister says "equity is central to any debate on climate change" | Comments

Makes her first public address in Durban at a side event organised by CSE in association with the ministry

  Contact us
  Durban: Delhi:
  Chandra Bhushan Papia Samajdar
  Email: Email:
  Phone: +27 732335697 Phone: +91 9811906977
  Skype ID: csechandra  
  Souparno Banerjee  
  Phone: +27 71 023 3222  


Tuesday, December 6, 2011 - 11:46
India's Intervention at the LCA Plenary

Intervention of India in the LCA stocktaking plenary 10:00-11:30 AM; 5th December 2011

Wednesday, November 30, 2011 - 16:55
Cancun Agreements

Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010

Download pdf


Tuesday, December 6, 2011 - 18:06
The imperative of equity for an effective climate agreement | Comments

By Sunita Narain, director-general, CSE

Download pdf

Tuesday, December 6, 2011 - 18:06
Equity and the transition to a low carbon economy | Comments

By Chandra Bhushan, deputy director, CSE

Download pdf

Tuesday, December 6, 2011 - 18:06
Furthering Climate Justice : Protecting the Vulnerable, Compensation for Impacts | Comments

By Ambuj Sagar, Vipula and Mahesh Chaturvedi Professor of Policy Studies Indian Institute of Technology Delhi

Download pdf