An oasis in Dewas: case study of Mahukheda | Centre for Science and Environment


An oasis in Dewas: case study of Mahukheda

“Mahukheda ki ghati, mare raand, jeevit mati” goes a local saying here.
It implies “in the valley of Mahukheda, the women die and the men prosper”.

Habiting the hilly regions of Dewas district in Madhya Pradesh, this village with a population of 3,400 (residing in 475 families) has always been water-poor, burdening its women with the daily chore of fetching water over long distances and undulating terrains. “So many men in our village have died bachelors, no other village wanted to marry its daughters here, looking at their plight”, a group of elderly men explained. “When the MLA Mishti Lal Kangwal’s wife came to this village and went to fetch water with the women here, she realised their daily hardship and convinced her husband to improve the water situation for us”, added another member of this group.

Today this village is a proud owner of a successful community run piped water supply scheme. Nearly every household in Mahukheda has a tap connection, thereby relieving women of a massive burden and men of their stigmatised bachelorhood. Water is brought to these taps from a 70,000 litre overhead tank, made on the private land of a villager, who decided to donate his land for this purpose, to the panchayat. Water is pumped to this tank from a sumpwell, half a kilometre away. This sump is filled with water coming from the recharge structures that have been constructed 3 kms away, under the watershed work done in this village on a seasonal stream, Pakhalia Khal. Check dams, dykes, percolations tanks, stop dams, contour trenches and revival of old ponds are some of the works undertaken by the watershed committee. An excellent example of convergence of various government schemes and departments, this water supply initiative has converged works of PHED, National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Rajiv Gandhi Watershed Mission, Central Ground Water Board and the Total Sanitation Campaign.

“Even though we had 14 public standposts installed in our village since 1962, we had a perpetual water shortage as they would run dry in the summer and fights would brew around them” recalled Shiv Narayan Chowdhary, the secretary of their Village Water and Sanitation Committee (VWSC). It was when the panchayat heard about the work done in Ralegan Siddhi, Maharashtra, that they felt inspired to visit it, learn and replicate the model here. Having done their homework, the panchayat put forth a proposal of a community run but PHED installed piped water scheme with assured sustainability by way of watershed development, to the PHED in 2004. When given a positive response from the PHED, they formed the VWSC as well as the Watershed Committee and began working on the scheme, which was completed in 2007. The total cost of the piped water scheme was RS. 23.63 lakhs of which the community contributed 2.38 lakhs (amount to 10 per cent of the total cost). Getting the communities to contribute 10 per cent of the costs has always been a tough task but Mahukheda was an exception with people coming out and paying their share with money and even labour. According to Rajesh Joshi, Executive Engineer, PHED Dewas, “once the community realises the benefit of the scheme, they set their own rules for involvement. The role of the department is then to design a scheme which fulfil their aspirations and meet the quality norms”.

“It was a step by step process and we learnt on the job. We didn't have all answers and solutions right from the beginning. For example, initially we provided piped connections in homes without taps, so when the water would flow in them, there was no way of stopping it and had to be collected. But many families didn’t need that much water and it was leading to much wastage. We then installed taps in all the connections. This way, we learnt from many mistakes we made on the way” said Anirudh Singh Pawar, head of the Watershed Committee, also a lawyer by profession. 

The big investments were made by the PHED while the VWSC took care of the O & M as well as electricity bills, using the monthly payments made by each member of the village and the initial contribution made by each family. Unlike other villages, the monthly contribution here is not per family but per person (Rs.5) and per connection (Rs.10). Thus, those with 2 connections and more family members are not subsidised by those with small families and just 1 connection. Those with animal sheds pay an extra Rs.40/month for a separate connection for the shed. The village has been divided into 12 sectors for laying out the pipelines and each sector is provided water for 40 minutes/day, at a different time. Public standposts have been removed as it was widely held that they are unhygienic and cause filth around them. Quality control is maintained by the anganwadi worker, Lachmi, who is well versed with the water testing kit and does monthly checks to ensure good quality. A chlorinator has been installed at the sumpwell for basic disinfection. The total cost on the electricity comes to Rs. 4,000 per months while the pump operator is paid Rs. 2,500 per month. Based on the contribution received from the households ever since the piped water supply scheme is running  and after paying the electricity and operator's salary, the VWSC has a balance of Rs. 1.97 lakhs in their account with an yearly saving to the tune of Rs. 23,000. Financial sustainability of the scehmes has thus been maintained in Mahukheda.

Lachmi is one of the few women of this village who is actively involved in the operation and maintenance of this scheme. While women are technically a part of both the committees, they are not particularly active owing to their illiteracy. Members of these committees have been unanimously chosen by the village and heads of these committees, by the committee members. They meet once a month on their own as well as with the panchayat. The responsibility of these committees isn’t just technical and financial, but also that of spreading awareness within the community about the benefits of this scheme to sustain community support. Since community mobilisation isn’t just required to begin the process but is essential to sustain the system, a consistent and regular effort of these committees is in this direction.

Ensuring community support is the tricky part which PHED usually finds challenging. How does one involve the villagers for successful maintenance of the system? Unless community members don’t feel a sense of ownership towards their amenities, they will not be interested to maintain it. This sense of ownership comes either through financial contribution, labour contribution or participation in decision making. In Mahukheda, all three have played important roles and have therefore successfully sustained community involvement to run the scheme.
 

Follow us on 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
gobar times